Pak Politicises FATF, Hires Top Lobbying Firm For A Us Bailout From Grey List
Islamabad requires support of at least 12 out of 39 member states to remove
its name from the grey list and this will largely depend on the approach the
US will take at the Paris plenary
In view of the upcoming October 21-23 plenary and sub-groups meeting of the
Financial Action Task Force (FATF), Pakistan is understood to have hired a top
lobbyist firm on the Capitol Hill to push a narrative favouring Islamabad with
Trump administration and get bailed out of the club of nations on the “grey
list.”
With all-weather friend and iron brother China, Ottoman empire revivalist
Turkey and increasingly radicalised Malaysia behind Pakistan, there is no
possibility of Islamabad getting pushed into FATF’s black list as only three
out of 39 member states are required to block the proposal. Islamabad,
however, requires support of at least 12 out of 39 member states to remove its
name from the grey list and this will largely depend on the approach the US
will take at the Paris plenary.
According to diplomats based in the US and Paris, the Pakistan foreign
ministry has hired Houston (in Texas) based lobbying firm Linden Strategies to
push its case with the Trump administration. The lobbying firm website
describes it as a “government relations and business development firm
providing strategic analysis and advisory to domestic and international
clients, including sovereign nations.” The firm’s specialisation is in
government relations, strategic communication, business advisory and political
consulting with clients spanning the globe.
Apparently, the narrative that Pakistan wants the Houston firm to communicate
to Trump administration is as follows:
Despite hiring a top lobbying firm and offering its leverage with Taliban to
US for reduction of violence in Afghanistan, Pakistan will not be able to
escape the grey list this time as its 2019 mutual evaluation report leaves a
lot to be desired and it is still to comply with all the 27 points of FATF
action plan of the past.
No comments:
Post a Comment