Chinese President Xi Jinping during a press briefing in Beijing

Beijing is strenuously pushing the Belt and Road Initiative to dispel doubts being raised over its economic benefits

by Jayadeva Ranade

Faced with growing doubts about the much-touted economic benefits of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), accentuated by the recent cancellation of two projects by Pakistan and Nepal, its earliest supporters, the 19th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has incorporated the ambitious $1.4 trillion Geo-economic BRI into the Party Constitution. Inextricably woven into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s agenda of making China a global power by 2050, the BRI is set to be included in the country’s constitution at the National People’s Congress — China’s version of a parliament — in March 2018. This will assure it of party and State backing.

In recent months, China has begun to strenuously push the BRI. The speech of last month by Harvard-educated Chinese Politburo member, Liu He, director of the Central Small Leading Group for Economic Reforms, reflected this. Reiterating China’s commitment to globalisation asserted by Chinese President Xi Jinping last year at Davos, Liu He linked this with the BRI. Saying it would ease restrictions on market access he described it as upholding the governance concept of discussing together, building together, and sharing together.

At the same time, the New York Times reported that President Michel Temer of Brazil received an unexpected offer from Beijing for Latin American nations to work closely with China on the BRI. Elsewhere in Davos, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi praised China’s rapidly expanding investments in Pakistan, including power stations and a large port. He dismissed reports of controversy over whether China’s giant construction projects were compromising Pakistan’s sovereignty, its environment or its financial stability.

During his recent visit to China, French President Emmanuel Macron tactfully avoided endorsing the BRI. Instead, he reminded interlocutors that the ancient Silk Road was never only Chinese, but a Sino-European trade route, adding that New Silk Roads could not be “one-way”. Keen to avoid a repetition of this failure, China exerted pressure on British Prime Minister Theresa May, with its ambassador to the UK, Liu Xiaoming, urging her to endorse the BRI during her three-day visit to China. While Jin Canrong, Professor of International Relations at Renmin University, said “If Prime Minister May is smart enough, she would know what China wants to hear from her the most is the support of the belt and road,” May finally avoided endorsing the BRI. Meanwhile, the US-based Centre for Strategic International Studies estimated that 89% of the contracts of the BRI have gone to Chinese companies.